20 July News Working with Expert Witnesses: Single Joint Experts 07. Receiving Instructions, 09. Being instructed as a Single Joint Expert, 06. Rules and Regulations, 08. Working with Instructing Parties, 13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements In the fifth article in the Working with expert witnesses series, Richard Lodge a Partner at Stewarts, discusses his experience of working with Single Joint Experts.
16 July News Expert Witnesses at a Turning Point 16. Criticism and Complaints, 17. Maintaining your professional edge, Artificial Intelligence, AI, 06. Rules and Regulations, 14. Changing your opinion, 08. Working with Instructing Parties, 15. Giving Oral Evidence This year’s Annual Conference discussed AI, independence, credibility, transparency and the changing expectations on expert witnesses.
16 July Podcast Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026 07. Receiving Instructions, 16. Criticism and Complaints, 17. Maintaining your professional edge, 10. Records Assessments and Site Visits, 06. Rules and Regulations, 11. Report Writing, 14. Changing your opinion, 08. Working with Instructing Parties, 13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements, 15. Giving Oral Evidence This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the EWI Annual Conference which was held on 19 June. The Conference got off to a great start with a keynote speech on AI & the Expert Witness by Sir Geoffrey Vos, the Master of the Rolls, and carried on with great speakers and panels. Join us on a trip down memory lane as we relive our key highlights from the event.
30 June Case Updates Regal BA Limited v Jun Zhang [2026] EWHC 1446 (Ch) Chartered Building Surveyor, 10. Records Assessments and Site Visits, Property valuation, 11. Report Writing, 08. Working with Instructing Parties, 15. Giving Oral Evidence The claimant sought damages amounting to the difference between the £16.9 million contract sale price from a failed house sale and the sum ultimately obtained for the property of £10.1 million, less that £2.5 million forfeited deposit. After finding the expert evidence compromised by the information provided to the experts, the judge set out a better approach to expert evidence in property valuation.
22 June News Advocate Economists and the Competition Appeal Tribunal 06. Rules and Regulations, 11. Report Writing, 08. Working with Instructing Parties, 13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements, Competition Appeals Tribunal At a recent Frontier Economics Litigation event, the President of the Competition Appeal Tribunal, The Honourable Mrs Justice Bacon, warned that advocate economists, or economists who ignore obvious analytical points adverse to their client, were not helpful to the Tribunal and self-defeating for the expert.
11 June Podcast Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness Expert Witness, 07. Receiving Instructions, 09. Being instructed as a Single Joint Expert, 06. Rules and Regulations, 11. Report Writing, 08. Working with Instructing Parties, Expert Advisor This month, on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the issues and challenges of being an expert advisor versus an expert witness, and especially transitioning from one to the other, with three guests who share their experiences and extremely helpful advice. We also briefly look at the role of the expert advisor when there is a Single Joint Expert, and assessors and scientific advisors. And, of course, as always, you can also listen to our 'What's going on at EWI' and 'Newsreel' segments to keep up-to-date on the latest developments in the world of expert witnesses and expert evidence.
21 May News Working with Expert Witnesses in Clinical Negligence Claims: Practical Considerations and Common Pitfalls 07. Receiving Instructions, 11. Report Writing, 08. Working with Instructing Parties In the fourth article in the Working with expert witnesses series, Michael Kingman from Setfords Solicitors, discusses his experience of working with expert witnesses in clinical negligence. In his March 2026 article, Thomas Hamilton provides a clear exposition of the expert's role and best practice in serious injury litigation when acting for claimants. In clinical negligence claims, the role of the medical expert is even more critical, as expert evidence is required on breach of duty, causation, and condition/prognosis. This article offers selective comments on the practice and procedure relating to medical evidence, based on the author's experience, with the aim of providing practical guidance and, where appropriate, prompting reflection.
14 May Day in the life A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness 03. Setting Fees and Getting Paid, 08. Working with Instructing Parties, 15. Giving Oral Evidence We speak to David Deacon, a chartered surveyor who has spent his career in residential property. He founded Housing Disrepair Surveys, leading a team of Expert Witnesses operating nationwide in housing disrepair claims. Here, he tells us how the business came about, why impartiality is everything, and what advice he would give to any surveyor considering Expert Witness work.
16 April Day in the life A Day in the Life of a Learning Disability and Nursing Expert Witness 01. Starting your Expert Witness Business, 10. Records Assessments and Site Visits, 11. Report Writing, 08. Working with Instructing Parties, 15. Giving Oral Evidence We speak to Lynn Hannon, a learning disability and autism specialist nurse who works as an Expert Witness on quantum care assessments, loss of service claims, and Court of Protection cases. Here, she tells us how she found her way into the role, what keeps her motivated, and the advice she would give to anyone considering the same path.
18 March Case Updates Presbar Diecastings Limited v GW Atkins & Sons Limited & Anor Neutral Citation Number[2026] EWHC 399 (Ch) 07. Receiving Instructions, 11. Report Writing, 08. Working with Instructing Parties, 15. Giving Oral Evidence The claimant was suing for the unpaid balance of the purchase price of assets used in its high-pressure aluminium diecasting business. The defendants’ expert received instructions that limited the scope of his investigation and analysis. While the judge accorded less weight to his evidence, he did not accept the claimant’s suggestion that the defendants’ expert ought to have either declined the instructions or proffered his opinion on wider valuation issues even in relation to issues outside of his instructions.