Login Join Us

Case updates

Case Updates

These case updates are provided by Professor Keith J.B. Rix, BMedBiol (Hons), MPhil, LLM, MD, FRCPsych, Hon FFFLM

Professor Keith Rix is a founding member of the Expert Witness Institute and became a Fellow in 2002. He is a member of the EWI’s Membership Committee. He is Visiting Professor of Medical Jurisprudence, School of Medicine, University of Chester, Honorary Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist, Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust and Mental Health and Intellectual Disability Lead, Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians.  He has provided expert evidence for over 35 years, including on a pro bono basis in capital cases in the Caribbean and Africa. He is the author of Expert Psychiatric Evidence and a co-editor, with Laurence Mynors-Wallis and Ciaran Craven SC, of the second edition, Rix’s Expert Psychiatric Evidence, which is being published by Cambridge University Press in September 2020. He is also the lead author of the Royal College of Psychiatrists Report CR193 Responsibilities of psychiatrist who provide expert opinion to courts and tribunals.   

Case Updates

Psychiatrist removed from the GMC Register following misconduct as an Expert Witness
Simon Berney-Edwards
/ Categories: Industry News, Case Updates

Psychiatrist removed from the GMC Register following misconduct as an Expert Witness

For those who believe they can act as an Expert Witness without the necessary training or understanding of their role, a recent case demonstrates why this is clearly not the case.

 

Dr Seshni Moodliar, a Consultant Psychiatrist, was removed from the GMC register following a hearing of the Medical Practitioners Tribunal.

 

Dr Moodliar had been instructed to provide expert evidence for the defence team. It was alleged that she:

  • Did not have the appropriate training or expertise
  • Failed to spend sufficient time to conduct an adequate assessment
  • Copied sections from another expert’s report into her own
  • Acted dishonestly

 

Dr Moodliar had admitted all of the allegations but some of the admissions were qualified. For example, she said that she should not remember exactly when she had started and finished her assessment and so had simply made an estimate of the time spent. These qualifications she put down as honest mistakes.

 

However, having assessed the evidence presented to the tribunal, they concluded that all the allegations were found proved.

 

In addition, the tribunal also conducted a review hearing relating to a tribunal which sat in 2022 which had imposed a sanction of conditions on Dr Moodliar for 18 months. That tribunal had found that Dr Moodliar had copied sections of someone else’s report and submitted it as her own work. In addition, in another case she had “failed to obtain a detailed background history; perform a mental state assessment; and check the veracity of B’s account. She also failed to explore the symptoms and possibility of insanity, schizophrenia or psychosis. In addition, she failed to prepare an expert report which was factually accurate. She also acted beyond her training and expertise in that she served as an expert witness without possessing sufficient knowledge of diminished responsibility and failed to keep accurate records”.

 

That tribunal had “determined that a period of conditional registration would allow Dr Moodliar to continue to work towards completing her journey of remediation, and to be able to demonstrate, with objective evidence, that she has learnt from her past failings and implemented steps to address them”.

 

In considering the sanctions to be imposed, the tribunal considered that:

  • Dr Moodliar demonstrated a lack of insight and has, in fact, regressed in her development of insight;
  • Dr Moodliar has undertaken some relevant training/courses but has not applied the training she has undertaken to develop her understanding of her misconduct;
  • Dr Moodliar misled the Tribunal during the hearing proceedings and failed to tell the truth during the hearing;
  • There has been a previous finding of impairment against Dr Moodliar for very similar allegations;
  • Dr Moodliar’s actions culminated in her giving misleading evidence before a Crown Court and she maintained her position until confronted with incontrovertible evidence to the contrary during cross-examination;
  • In preparation for this hearing, Dr Moodliar procured two testimonials as to her professionalism and honesty by misleading those who provided the testimonials;
  • Dr Moodliar misused her professional position when working with a vulnerable patient (as a consultant psychiatrist, the Tribunal considered this was particularly serious).

 

The Tribunal determined that her conduct was so serious that Dr Moodliar has been suspended with immediate effect and her name be erased from the Medical Register following the appeal period.

 

The full decision is available at the link below.

Previous Article Jennings v Otis Ltd [2023] EWHC 2039 (KB)
Next Article Experts making the evidence fit their own conclusions do not meet their duty to the Court
Print
1330
Comments are only visible to subscribers.