Login Join Us

Case updates

Case Updates

These case updates are provided by Professor Keith J.B. Rix, BMedBiol (Hons), MPhil, LLM, MD, FRCPsych, Hon FFFLM

Professor Keith Rix is a founding member of the Expert Witness Institute and became a Fellow in 2002. He is a member of the EWI’s Membership Committee. He is Visiting Professor of Medical Jurisprudence, School of Medicine, University of Chester, Honorary Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist, Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust and Mental Health and Intellectual Disability Lead, Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine of the Royal College of Physicians.  He has provided expert evidence for over 35 years, including on a pro bono basis in capital cases in the Caribbean and Africa. He is the author of Expert Psychiatric Evidence and a co-editor, with Laurence Mynors-Wallis and Ciaran Craven SC, of the second edition, Rix’s Expert Psychiatric Evidence, which is being published by Cambridge University Press in September 2020. He is also the lead author of the Royal College of Psychiatrists Report CR193 Responsibilities of psychiatrist who provide expert opinion to courts and tribunals.   

Case Updates

Thorvaldsen v Dundee City Council [2021] ScotCS CSOH 120
Priya Vaidya
/ Categories: Case Updates

Thorvaldsen v Dundee City Council [2021] ScotCS CSOH 120

The case: The pursuer, a teacher was struck on the head by a wooden partition, knocking him to the floor and rendering him briefly unconscious. He sought to recover damages from his employer. He claimed to have suffered a concussive head injury, followed by dizziness and confusion, debilitating headaches, and ultimately an exacerbation of his poor mental health, characterised by him in these proceedings as a recurrent depressive disorder and a somatic symptom disorder, from which he continued to suffer. The defenders said that the pursuer's injuries were limited to a concussive head injury and associated post - concussion symptoms, all of which resolved themselves within a period of about 7 weeks following the accident. The principal difficulty related to the evidence of the pursuer, whose persistent headaches, if they had an organic basis at all, could not be traced to any neurological injury sustained as a result of the accident.

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

Previous Article A Local Authority v JB [2021] UKSC 52
Next Article BCX v DTA [2021] EWHC B27 (Costs)
Print
581
Comments are only visible to subscribers.