Day in the life of an Expert Witness

Our day in the life series provides examples of the kind of work undertaken by our members across a range of different professional backgrounds.

Appeal arguing that a single joint expert should have been male rejected
Wiebke Morgan 1080

Appeal arguing that a single joint expert should have been male rejected

byWiebke Morgan

This judgement was made in an appeal against a case management order in private law proceedings under the Children Act 1989 relating to a boy, (“A”), now aged 8. The order under appeal permitted the parties to instruct a named independent social worker to carry out an assessment to assist the court to determine issues relating to child arrangements and education. The expert named in the order is a woman. The appellant father proposed that the assessment should be carried out by a male social worker. He asserted that the order permitting the instruction of a female social worker was an infringement of his human rights.

 

The appeal was rejected. For details of the judgement see the link below.

 

If you haven't done so, pleased do sign the pledge to support Equal Representation For Expert Witnesses - link below.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.