Questions and Answers

Home/About/Contact us/Member Helpline/Questions and Answers

Before contacting the EWI Helpline, have a look at the questions asked by fellow members, you may find an answer to your query:

Advice notes are provided to members of the Expert Witness Institute in support of their work. They represent the Institute’s view of good practice in a particular area, and members are not obliged to follow them. They do not constitute legal or professional advice and should not be relied upon as a substitute for it. Whilst care has been taken to ensure that they are accurate, up to date, and useful, The Expert Witness Institute will not accept any legal liability in relation to them. If specific advice or information is required, then a suitably qualified professional should be consulted.

Frederick Ayinde, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin)
Sean Mosby 193
Case Updates

Frederick Ayinde, R (on the application of) v The London Borough of Haringey [2025] EWHC 1383 (Admin)

bySean Mosby

 

In the case of Ayinde v The London Borough of Haringey, the barrister for the Claimant cited several non-existent cases in pleadings and was unable to explain to the court's satisfaction how these false citations had occurred. 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

More links

  1. Link to the judgment

  2. Richard Marshall, AI and the Expert Witness

  3. Expert Matters Podcast: AI and Expert Witness

Share

Print

Tags

Artificial IntelligenceAI
Comments are only visible to subscribers.