26 August 2021 Wiebke Morgan 2771 Case Updates Dana UK Axle Ltd v Freudenberg FST GmbH [2021] EWHC 1413 (TCC), 2021 WL 02143477 byWiebke Morgan The case: This claim arose from the alleged premature failure of pinion seals manufactured by the Defendant and supplied to the Claimant. The Claimant applied on Day 7 of the trial to exclude FST's technical expert evidence unless various defects in the reports of FST's technical experts were remedied. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags IndependenceDisclosure of instructionsDisclosure of documents relied uponRetention of records of investigations carried outCooperation with the adverse party’s expertsGuidance for the Instruction of Experts in Civil CCPR Part 35TCC GuideExperts meeting11. Report Writing08. Working with Instructing Parties12. Responding to questions13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements10. Records Assessments and Site Visits Related articles Should a solicitor use track changes on my expert report Biased instructions, harassment and acting pro bono Review of Guidance for the instruction of experts in civil claims An expert report that is entirely equivocal on the key issues is of little assistance to the court The diagnosis hang-up and cardiological manifestations of PTSD Comments are only visible to subscribers.