01 March 2020 Simon Berney-Edwards 1142 Case Updates A Clinical Commissioning Group v AF [2020] EWCOP 16, 2020 WL 01494079 bySimon Berney-Edwards Nature of case: The first question to be decided was whether AF had the capacity to decide whether to continue to receive CANH via a PEG tube inserted into his stomach. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Capacity casesBest interest10. Report Writing09. Records Assessments and Site Visits Related articles Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or disbelieve? When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Khan & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 531 Pfizer Inc v Uniqure Biopharma BV [2024] EWHC 2672 (Pat) Switch article FXF v Ampleforth Abbey Trustees [2020] EWHC 791 (QB), 2020 WL 01663316 Previous Article Leafrealm Land Limited v The City of Edinburgh Council [2020] CSOH 34, 2020 WL 01290090 Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.