The Digital Footprint: An Overlooked Source of Expert  Evidence — Lessons from Shaheen and... The Digital Footprint: An Overlooked Source of Expert Evidence — Lessons from Shaheen and...

The Digital Footprint: An Overlooked Source of Expert Evidence — Lessons from Shaheen and...

Modern digital systems generate a detailed electronic footprint, including timestamps, document revisions, communications, task completion, and other...
Trinsic Collagen Limited v Procoll Limited [2026] EWHC 1793 (Ch) Trinsic Collagen Limited v Procoll Limited [2026] EWHC 1793 (Ch)

Trinsic Collagen Limited v Procoll Limited [2026] EWHC 1793 (Ch)

The Claimant alleged that the Defendant was in breach of the agreement between the parties for the supply of single alpha chain collagen. The judge...
Nord Stream AG v Lloyd's Insurance Company SA & Anor Neutral Citation Number[2026] EWHC... Nord Stream AG v Lloyd's Insurance Company SA & Anor Neutral Citation Number[2026] EWHC...

Nord Stream AG v Lloyd's Insurance Company SA & Anor Neutral Citation Number[2026] EWHC...

The operator of the Nord Stream pipeline was suing insurance companies for damages caused to the pipelines by explosions which rendered them...
Working with Expert Witnesses: Single Joint Experts Working with Expert Witnesses: Single Joint Experts

Working with Expert Witnesses: Single Joint Experts

In the fifth article in the Working with expert witnesses series, Richard Lodge a Partner at Stewarts, discusses his experience of working...
Expert Witnesses at a Turning Point Expert Witnesses at a Turning Point

Expert Witnesses at a Turning Point

This year’s Annual Conference discussed AI, independence, credibility, transparency and the changing expectations on expert witnesses.
Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026 Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026

Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the EWI Annual Conference which was held on 19 June. The Conference got off to a great...
A Day in the Life of a Dangerous Dog Legislation Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Dangerous Dog Legislation Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Dangerous Dog Legislation Expert Witness

Shaun Hesmondhalgh has been an Expert Witness since 2016, specialising in cases involving dog welfare, dangerous dog behaviour, and dog-related human...
Guidance on the Remuneration of Expert Witnesses in  Crime Cases Guidance on the Remuneration of Expert Witnesses in Crime Cases

Guidance on the Remuneration of Expert Witnesses in Crime Cases

The Legal Aid Agency ('LAA') has issued Guidance on the Remuneration of Expert Witnesses in Crime Cases.
Podcast Episode 27: A case that changed me -  Tony Saggers Podcast Episode 27: A case that changed me - Tony Saggers

Podcast Episode 27: A case that changed me - Tony Saggers

In this month's in 'A case that changed me' we are talking with Tony Saggers who is a Threat, Risk and Harm consultant, with 30 years of...
A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a General Practitioner Expert Witness

Dr Frances Cranfield is a GP, Assistant Coroner, and a founding member of the Expert Witness Institute. With three decades of experience spanning...
Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness

This month, on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the issues and challenges of being an expert advisor versus an expert witness, and...
A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Housing Disrepair Expert Witness

We speak to David Deacon, a chartered surveyor who has spent his career in residential property. He founded Housing Disrepair Surveys, leading a team...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot - Webinar and Guidance
Sean Mosby 1452

Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot - Webinar and Guidance

by Sean Mosby

 

Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot: Guidance

The Pilot for Access to Public Domain Documents (governed by Practice Direction 51ZH) was originally intended to commence in October 2025 but will now go live from 1st January 2026.

The pilot will apply to the Commercial Court (including the London Circuit Commercial Court) and the Financial List (except where a party is unrepresented and had not used the Court’s CE File electronic filing system previously). It is intended that there will be a review after 6 months although the pilot is not scheduled to finish until 31st December 2027.

If the pilot is successful, it will then be extended to other courts – most likely the Business and Property courts first.

The Pilot identifies certain documents as Public Domain Documents. It is intended to only capture documents which as a matter of law enter the public domain when a hearing takes place in public without imposing an undue burden on the parties or the Court. The Pilot will see a change from the current position, whereby an application is required to access the documents, to the default being the provision of the documents.

The main categories of documents covered by the Pilot are:

  • Written submissions – skeleton argument and written and opening closing submissions, as well as all other submissions provided to the judge during the course of the hearing

  • Witness statements/affidavits

  • Expert reports (including annexes and exhibits)

How does it work?

The documents will be accessed via CE-File which is the court’s existing system with the parties filing the documents themselves in the appropriate category.

There will be a default filing period for documents. This will be from the day they enter the public domain by being referred to in a court hearing and ending at 16:00 14 days later unless otherwise ordered or agreed by the parties.

As filing will be the default position any party who wishes to limit or not file will need to seek an order to that effect before the filing deadline (Filing Modification Orders – FMOs).

The PD contains a provision for an order to be made compelling parties to make the filing and could, if not complied with, result in appropriate sanctions such as contempt of court.

It will be the responsibility of the lawyers to upload the documents. Further information can be found in the accompanying Guidance Note.
 

Things to Note:

The most important thing is to be aware that if you are acting in a case which comes under the Pilot then your report will become a Public Domain Document once your evidence is given in open court. If the hearing is private, then the report will not become a Public Domain Document.

All Experts should read and familiarise themselves with both the Practice Direction and the Guidance.

Although the current scope of the Pilot is limited it is likely that in the future this will apply across the board in the civil courts and your reports will automatically become Public Domain Documents.

You should:

  • Check with the instructing party whether the case will be dealt with under the pilot.

  • Discuss with the instructing party when your report will be first used or referred to. It is likely that this will be when you give evidence in chief and this will be when it becomes publicly available.

  • Discuss with your instructing party about how any sensitive information might be used in your report and how they would like it dealt with.

  • Do not include your own personal information, other than that which is required by the procedural rules.  For example, consider not including email or telephone numbers. Remember to use your business address and not your personal one. It maybe that you consider having a separate registered business address if you work from home.

  • Consider your personal media profile and the information that is publicly available - especially if it is likely that your report could led to harassment or social media comments.

The Committee intends to review the Pilot after 6 months of operation. We would appreciate any details of your experiences with the Pilot to inform our engagement with the Committee’s review.  
 

Webinar

For further information, you can check out our free member Webinar.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.