Working with Expert Witnesses: Joint Expert Meetings Working with Expert Witnesses: Joint Expert Meetings

Working with Expert Witnesses: Joint Expert Meetings

In the sixth article in the Working with expert witnesses series, Alexandra Winch a Partner at Stewarts, discusses her experience of...
EWI releases workforce mapping research report EWI releases workforce mapping research report

EWI releases workforce mapping research report

This research has provided the first-ever assessment of the size and characteristics of the Expert Witness workforce in the UK.
Podcast Episode 30: Mapping the Expert Witness Workforce Podcast Episode 30: Mapping the Expert Witness Workforce

Podcast Episode 30: Mapping the Expert Witness Workforce

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkiss, discuss the EWI's project to map the Expert Witness...
EWI Guidance on Acting for Litigants in Person EWI Guidance on Acting for Litigants in Person

EWI Guidance on Acting for Litigants in Person

We have revised our recently published Guidance for experts on acting for litigants in person. After engagement with members, we have decided to amend...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Criminal Procedure Rules: new criminal practice directions
Wiebke Morgan 7691

Criminal Procedure Rules: new criminal practice directions

by Wiebke Morgan

On 29 May 2023 new criminal practice directions came into force. They are now organised as a set of chapters. Chapter 7 deals with Expert Evidence. There are several changes to note. 

Prof Keith Rix, Certified Fellow of the EWI  highlights and comments on these:

"First, 7.1.1 (previously 19A.1) has had a new item added to it:

 

7.1.1     Expert opinion evidence is admissible in criminal proceedings if, in summary:
                …
(d)          the expert opinion is sufficiently reliable to be admitted.

So there should be a ‘methodology’ section in your report where you provide sufficient information about the methodology you have adopted for the court to assess the reliability of your opinion 

Second, in relation to the requirement that a party wishing to introduce expert evidence should give notice of anything of which that party is aware which might reasonably be thought capable of undermining the reliability of the expert’s opinion or detracting from their credibility or impartiality, one of the examples has been made more explicit. 19A.7 (c) which is now 7.1.4(c) has been expanded from ‘adverse judicial comment’ to:

 

                adverse judicial comment regarding a particular expert or corporation or other body for whom the expert works whether by a first instance tribunal or on appeal

 

Third, whereas previously the parties were asked to consider holding an experts’ meeting, and they were not compulsory unless ordered by the court, paragraph 7.3.1 (previously 19C.1) states:

                The court must give a direction for a pre-hearing discussion between experts in every case unless unnecessary.

 

This means that experts’ meetings in the criminal jurisdiction are likely to become as common as in the civil and family jurisdictions.

 

Fourth, there is a change to the ‘Expert’s Declaration’ that affects experts instructed by the prosecution. The extra declaration required of experts instructed by the prosecution should now refer to the current CPS Guidance for Experts on Disclosure, Unused Material, and Case Management " 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.