13 June 2022 Priya Vaidya 979 Case Updates Mathieu v Hinds [2022] EWHC 924 (QB) byPriya Vaidya The case: a claim for damages for personal injuries arising out of a serious road traffic accident in which the Claimant sustained a serious brain injury. The experts agreed that the Claimant had made a very good recovery from his injuries. One of the key issues was whether the Claimant should be awarded provisional damages in relation to the chance of developing dementia due to his brain injury. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags PsychologyPsychiatry10. Report Writing Related articles Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or disbelieve? When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Khan & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 531 Pfizer Inc v Uniqure Biopharma BV [2024] EWHC 2672 (Pat) Switch article Commscope Technologies LLC v SOLiD Technologies, Inc [2022] EWHC 769 (Pat) Previous Article M (A Child : Private Law Children Proceedings: Case Management: Intimate Images) [2022] EWHC 986 (Fam) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.