Psychologists and general practitioner records Psychologists and general practitioner records

Psychologists and general practitioner records

This case has important lessons for psychology and psychiatry expert witnesses and also for lawyers. It makes clear that, at least in the Asylum and...
Working with Expert Witnesses: Joint Expert Meetings Working with Expert Witnesses: Joint Expert Meetings

Working with Expert Witnesses: Joint Expert Meetings

In the sixth article in the Working with expert witnesses series, Alexandra Winch a Partner at Stewarts, discusses her experience of...
EWI releases workforce mapping research report EWI releases workforce mapping research report

EWI releases workforce mapping research report

This research has provided the first-ever assessment of the size and characteristics of the Expert Witness workforce in the UK.
Podcast Episode 30: Mapping the Expert Witness Workforce Podcast Episode 30: Mapping the Expert Witness Workforce

Podcast Episode 30: Mapping the Expert Witness Workforce

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, Simon and EWI's Membership Manager, Will Watkiss, discuss the EWI's project to map the Expert Witness...
EWI Guidance on Acting for Litigants in Person EWI Guidance on Acting for Litigants in Person

EWI Guidance on Acting for Litigants in Person

We have revised our recently published Guidance for experts on acting for litigants in person. After engagement with members, we have decided to amend...
Blackpool Borough Council v RR [2026] EWFC 69 Blackpool Borough Council v RR [2026] EWFC 69

Blackpool Borough Council v RR [2026] EWFC 69

Laura Langley, 38, was alleged to have killed her seven-week-old daughter Edith who collapsed at the family home in Blackpool, Lancashire, in the...
KS v The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)... KS v The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)...

KS v The Secretary of State for the Home Department (Immigration and Asylum Chamber)...

The Appellant, a citizen of Tajikistan, was appealing the Respondent’s decision to refuse his protection claim. The Judge gained the distinct...
A Day in the Life of an Occupational Therapy Expert Witness A Day in the Life of an Occupational Therapy Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of an Occupational Therapy Expert Witness

Clare Cole is an Occupational Therapist with nearly 17 years of clinical experience, who now works as an Expert Witness in the medico-legal field....
A Day in the Life of a Physiotherapy Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Physiotherapy Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Physiotherapy Expert Witness

Kathryn Rowe is an Expert Witness and Physiotherapist with over 17 years of clinical experience in neurological, spinal and orthopaedic...
Podcast Episode 29: Acting for Litigants in Person Podcast Episode 29: Acting for Litigants in Person

Podcast Episode 29: Acting for Litigants in Person

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we discuss acting for litigants in person. The accessibility of tools like generative AI is making...
Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026 Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026

Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026

This month on the Expert Matters Podcast, we take a look at the EWI Annual Conference which was held on 19 June. The Conference got off to a great...
A Day in the Life of a Dangerous Dog Legislation Expert Witness A Day in the Life of a Dangerous Dog Legislation Expert Witness

A Day in the Life of a Dangerous Dog Legislation Expert Witness

Shaun Hesmondhalgh has been an Expert Witness since 2016, specialising in cases involving dog welfare, dangerous dog behaviour, and dog-related human...

Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Restrictions on unregulated Experts in Family Law Children Proceedings
Sean Mosby 1260

Restrictions on unregulated Experts in Family Law Children Proceedings

by Sean Mosby

Amendment to restrict unregulated experts in Family Law Children Proceedings

The Family Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2026 amend the Family Procedure Rules 2010 to restrict unregulated experts from acting as expert witnesses in Family Law Children Proceedings. The amendments come into force on 20 July 2026. The Amendment:

  • Amends rule 25.2 FPR to introduce definitions of “regulated expert” and “technical expert”, clarifying the categories of experts who may give evidence in certain children proceedings.

  • Inserts new rule 25.5A FPR to require, in certain children proceedings, that expert evidence is provided by a regulated expert, subject to specified exceptions.

  • Makes transitional provision so that the amendments relating to expert evidence do not apply to proceedings issued before those amendments come into force.

There are also amendments to Practice Directions 25B and 25C to support the introduction of Rule 25.5A.

Once the amendment comes into force, the court will only be able to give permission, under section 13(1), (3) and (5) of The Children and Families Act 2014, for expert evidence from a "regulated expert", unless the expert evidence is from an international social worker, a "technical expert" or an expert instructed in proceedings under Schedule 1 of the The Children Act 1989. The court may, however, give permission to instruct any expert where there is no regulated expert available. 

"Regulated expert" means an expert who is:

(a) regulated by a UK statutory body;

(b) on a register accredited by the Professional Standards Authority for Health and Social Care; or

(c) regulated by an approved regulator under the Legal Services Act 2007.

“Technical expert” means an expert who provides evidence on:

(a) digital forensics;

(b) DNA testing;

(c) handwriting analysis; or

(d) toxicology testing.

The EWI welcomes these amendments which reinforce the importance of genuine experts to the effective and efficient adminstration of justice. 

Background

From March to June 2025, the Family Procedure Rule Committee held a consultation on new Family Procedure Rule 25.5A concerning the instruction of unregulated experts. The consultation also proposed amendments to FPR 25.2 and Practice Directions ('PDs') 25B and 25C. The aim of amendment was to require any expert instructed in family law children proceedings to be regulated. A key purpose of the changes is to ensure that any expert instructed in family law children proceedings has the appropriate skills and qualifications on which to base their expert evidence. 

The key change from the consultation drafting related to consideration of how forensic experts should be reflected in the changes. The Committee decided that, rather than attempting to make the rule apply to forensic experts, they would be exempted and a new definition of ‘technical expert’ be introduced to provide for this.

As part of its considerations, the Committee also rejected a proposal to extend the rule change to financial remedy proceedings.

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.