24 August 2021 Wiebke Morgan 1017 Case Updates Beattie Passive Norse Limited v Canham Consulting Limited [2021] EWHC 1116 (TCC) byWiebke Morgan The case: a claim in professional negligence brought against a practice of consulting engineers. Evidence: The judge had to choose between the expert evidence of two structural engineers. He preferred the evidence of Mr X in all respects where that differed from the evidence of Mr Y. This was for the following reasons: To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags BiasIndependenceLanguageObjectivity11. Report Writing15. Giving Oral Evidence16. Criticism and Complaints Related articles Lost in translation A Day in the Life of an Aerial Imagery Expert Expert Evidence by the Back Door Elevate Your Expertise: Join the EWI's Inaugural Study Day in London An approach entirely contradictory to the duties and responsibilities of expert witnesses identified in The Ikarian Reefer Switch article Wigan Borough Council v Scullindale Global Limited [2021] EWHC 779 (Ch) Previous Article M(C) v M(M) [2021] SC EDIN 31 Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.