17 September 2024 Keith Rix 599 Case Updates Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal byKeith Rix Commentary This case is primarily of interest to obstetricians, illustrating the court’s approach to the disputed interpretation of cardiotocographic evidence. There were no midwifery issues as such, but it may be of some interest to midwifery experts. The general learning points speak for themselves without reading the summary. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags ObstetricsMidwifery11. Report Writing15. Giving Oral Evidence16. Criticism and Complaints Related articles Does the face fit? Not a bridge too far – dental negligence Advising as to the applicable law Podcast Episode 11: AI and the Expert Witness Nothing short of a demolition of the expert's evidence Switch article Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees Previous Article The Single Biggest Change White Paper Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.