17 September 2024 Keith Rix 743 Case Updates Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal byKeith Rix Commentary This case is primarily of interest to obstetricians, illustrating the court’s approach to the disputed interpretation of cardiotocographic evidence. There were no midwifery issues as such, but it may be of some interest to midwifery experts. The general learning points speak for themselves without reading the summary. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags ObstetricsMidwifery11. Report Writing15. Giving Oral Evidence16. Criticism and Complaints Related articles Disability and exclusion from school Philipa Hodgson v Dr Daniel Hammond & Anor [2025] EWHC 1261 (KB) Unresponsive episodes in a child and the role of chloral hydrate A Day in the Life of a Digital Forensics Expert Witness Martin Craig Nicholas & Ors v Barnes Davison Thomas & Anor [2025] EWHC 752 (Ch) Switch article Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees Previous Article The Single Biggest Change White Paper Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.