17 September 2024 Keith Rix 387 Case Updates Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal byKeith Rix Commentary This case is primarily of interest to obstetricians, illustrating the court’s approach to the disputed interpretation of cardiotocographic evidence. There were no midwifery issues as such, but it may be of some interest to midwifery experts. The general learning points speak for themselves without reading the summary. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags ObstetricsMidwifery10. Report Writing14. Giving Oral Evidence15. Criticism and Complaints Related articles Rebecca Lochrie v Matthew Edwards Judgment G48YJ355 A Day in the Life of an Emergency Medicine Expert Witness Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion Justice for people with a hearing impairment Alan Prescott-Brann v Chelsea and Westminster’s Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & Anor [2024] EWHC 3314 (KB) Switch article Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees Previous Article The Single Biggest Change White Paper Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.