17 September 2024 Keith Rix 1544 Case Updates Cardiotocograph – normal or abnormal byKeith Rix Commentary This case is primarily of interest to obstetricians, illustrating the court’s approach to the disputed interpretation of cardiotocographic evidence. There were no midwifery issues as such, but it may be of some interest to midwifery experts. The general learning points speak for themselves without reading the summary. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags ObstetricsMidwifery16. Criticism and Complaints11. Report Writing15. Giving Oral Evidence Related articles Peter Marples & Ors v Secretary of State for Education [2025] EWHC 2794 (Ch) A Day in the Life of an Orthopaedic Spinal Expert Witness Without hesitation, I attach no weight whatsoever …. Muhammad Suleman against One Insurance Ltd [2025] SC GLA 88 To list or not to list, that is the question Switch article Podcast Episode 4: Expert Fees Previous Article The Single Biggest Change White Paper Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.