21 February 2022 Priya Vaidya 2083 Case Updates Director of Public Prosecutions v IG [2021] IECA 91 by Priya Vaidya The case: The appellant was convicted of rape, sexual assault and making a threat to kill or cause serious harm to the complainant The appellant in the four of five interviews denied sexual intercourse but when the results of certain DNA tests showing the presence of his semen in or on the body of the complainant were put to him in the fifth, he said that intercourse had taken place by consent. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags 06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing Related articles EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion New Guide to Becoming an Expert Witness Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness Podcast Episode 26: Expert Advisor versus Expert Witness Switch article Fixed recoverable costs in lower value clinical negligence claims Previous Article ECU Group PLC v HSBC Bank PLC [2021] EWHC 2875 (Comm) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.