21 February 2022 Priya Vaidya 1109 Case Updates Director of Public Prosecutions v IG [2021] IECA 91 byPriya Vaidya The case: The appellant was convicted of rape, sexual assault and making a threat to kill or cause serious harm to the complainant The appellant in the four of five interviews denied sexual intercourse but when the results of certain DNA tests showing the presence of his semen in or on the body of the complainant were put to him in the fifth, he said that intercourse had taken place by consent. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags 06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing Related articles Andrew Cannestra v Mclaren Automotive Events Limited [2025] EWHC 1844 (KB) The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025 A fundamentally flawed report Expert evidence and the materiality of a risk Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Switch article Fixed recoverable costs in lower value clinical negligence claims Previous Article ECU Group PLC v HSBC Bank PLC [2021] EWHC 2875 (Comm) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.