29 July 2025 Keith Rix 67 Case Updates Extradition and suicide risk byKeith Rix Commentary This case is important for two reasons. It illustrates that having “no control over actions” and “not making a rational decision" to end his life can be construed as satisfying Turner proposition 4. It makes clear that Turner proposition (4) is not directed at the general background or lead-up to a suicide attempt but is focused on the moment in time when suicide is attempted. Learning points: Whether or not a requested person has made a rational decision that he will take his own life if he is extradited is not the question posed by Turner. Turner proposition (4) is not directed at the general background or lead-up to a suicide attempt but is focused on the moment in time when suicide is attempted. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags PsychologyExtraditionSuicide riskPsychiatryTurner proposition 4 Related articles ADHD, ASD and disability The diagnosis hang-up and cardiological manifestations of PTSD Evidentiary reliability and the meaning of words Degenerative or traumatic spinal damage? Krzysztof Lukasik v Circuit Court, Praga in Warsaw (A Polish Judicial Authority) [2025] EWHC 282 (Admin) Switch article The Criminal Procedure Rules 2025 Previous Article Andrew Cannestra v Mclaren Automotive Events Limited [2025] EWHC 1844 (KB) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.