13 June 2022 Priya Vaidya 1112 Case Updates HA (Expert Evidence; Mental Health) Sri Lanka [2022] UKUT 00111 (IAC) byPriya Vaidya The case: This was the decision of the Upper Tribunal, following the setting aside by the Upper Tribunal of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal to allow the appellant’s appeal against the decision of the respondent to refuse the appellant’s human rights claim. At the hearing in respect of the re-making decision the Upper Tribunal heard oral evidence from Dr Raj Persaud and Professor Neil Greenberg, both of whom appeared as expert witnesses. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags PsychologyPsychiatry10. Report Writing07. Working with Instructing Parties14. Giving Oral Evidence09. Records Assessments and Site Visits Related articles Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or disbelieve? When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work A Day in the Life of a Medicolegal Expert Witness Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Khan & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 531 Switch article Pal v Damen [2022] EWHC 4697 (QB) Previous Article MTT v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022] UKAITUR PA117592017 Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.