26 August 2021 Wiebke Morgan 2620 Case Updates Ihenacho v The London Borough of Croydon [2021] EWCA Crim 798, 2021 WL 02143805 by Wiebke Morgan The case: An appeal to determine whether fresh evidence from forensic consultant psychiatrists should be admitted; and if so, whether the fresh evidence showed that Clarissa Ihenacho, the appellant, was not fit to plead when a confiscation order was made. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Fitness to stand trialPsychiatry10. Records Assessments and Site Visits11. Report Writing Related articles Podcast Episode 28: Reflections on the EWI Conference 2026 Evie Toombes v Dr Mitchell [2021] EWHC 3234 (QB): Key Lessons for Expert Witnesses Across All Disciplines A Day in the Life of a Dangerous Dog Legislation Expert Witness X and Y (Care Proceedings: Fact Finding: Death of a Child: Expert Evidence), Re [2025] EWFC 132 Diclofenac and the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis Switch article C v DT [2021] SC GLA 37, 2021 WL 02169444 Previous Article Dana UK Axle Ltd v Freudenberg FST GmbH [2021] EWHC 1413 (TCC), 2021 WL 02143477 Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.