[EasyDNNnews:IfExists:GalleryBackLink] [EasyDNNnewsLocalizedText:ViewInGallery] [EasyDNNnews:EndIf:GalleryBackLink] 31 December 2019[EasyDNNnews:EndIf:Event] Simon Berney-Edwards 3549 [EasyDNNnews:Categories separator=", "] Mustard v Flower [2019] EWHC 2623 (QB), 2019 WL 05104326 bySimon Berney-Edwards Nature of case: Road traffic accident. C claims that in the accident she sustained a subarachnoid brain haemorrhage and a diffuse axonal brain injury such as to have left her with cognitive and other deficits. But there are marked differences between the experts as to her presentation and the interpretation of her medical records, imaging and history. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Covert recordingNeuropsychological assessmentPart 3510. Records Assessments and Site Visits06. Rules and Regulations12. Responding to questions Related articles Podcast Episode 23: Experts in the Courts What were the effects of repeated sexual abuse at the hands of a schoolteacher? An expert report that is almost worse than useless If you're wearing two hats, make sure you comply with the rules Experts and alienating behaviour: a fundamentally unsound process Switch article Somek & Associates approved as an EWI Corporate Partner Previous Article A Local Authority v M, F, E, W, X Y Z (by their Children's Guardian) [2019] EWHC 1447 (Fam), 2019 WL 06313296 Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.