Priya Vaidya / 22 November 2021 / Categories: Case Updates, Giving Oral Evidence Re CSB 123 Ltd [2021] EWHC 2506 (Ch) Judgment: The judge compared the two expert witnesses: To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Previous Article AHA v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKAITUR PA014032020 Next Article Re BU [2021] EWCOP 54 Print 1147 Tags: Duty to the courtCross-examinationValuation methodologyComparablesMultipliers Related articles R v Valdo Calocane, The Crown Court at Nottingham, 25 January 2024, unreported An expert who oversteps their role puts their evidence at risk Experts making the evidence fit their own conclusions do not meet their duty to the Court Stay within your expertise - you don’t become an expert by virtue of having acquired knowledge in the course of the case itself Claimant has turned into Litigant in person – do I have to attend court and how do I ensure I get paid? Comments are only visible to subscribers.