26 August Case Updates Loose talk, snide remarks and the expertise of general practitioners Psychiatry, Disability, General Practice, Clinical Depression, Disability Discrimination Act 1995 This is an important case for three reasons. First, it found that a general practitioner, giving evidence about the depressive disorder diagnosed in primary care, was giving expert evidence. Second, it illustrates the difficulties for courts and tribunals arising from the looseness with which some medical professionals, and most laypeople, use such terms as "depression" ("clinical" or otherwise), "anxiety" and "stress" and to which list can be added, also for the benefit of surgeons, “shock”. Third, it is a good illustration of the approach likely to be taken in an Employment Tribunal disability case. J v DLA Piper UK LLP [2010] UKEAT 0263 09 1506