03 February 2026 Keith Rix 1118 Case Updates The expert's flawed understanding of the intermediary's role by Keith Rix Commentary It appears that in this case an expert recommended the appointment of an intermediary without understanding the role of an intermediary. The court did accommodate proper breaks and ensured clear explanations as to the charges faced. Learning points: The role of an intermediary is to help with communication. An expert who considers that a defendant might need an intermediary should advise the instruction of an intermediary with a view to identifying any communication difficulties with which they might assist and give their reasons. Clear explanations as to the charges faced by a defendant are in the first instance a matter for the defendant’s lawyers and not for an intermediary. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags Intermediary06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing Related articles Advocate Economists and the Competition Appeal Tribunal EWI Annual Conference 2026: Opening keynote tackles the use of AI in Expert Reports Do not leave it until cross-examination to reveal your true opinion New Guide to Becoming an Expert Witness Take care not to conflate your role as a contractor with your duties as an expert witness Switch article The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v PPE Medpro Limited [2025] EWHC 2486 (Comm) Previous Article Alame & Ors v Shell PLC & Anor [2025] EWHC 1539 (KB) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.