05 September 2024 Keith Rix 1036 Case Updates When is a summary not a summary? byKeith Rix Commentary The experts in this case appear to have set out a joint statement in the form of a Scott schedule. Unfortunately one of the experts used his column to set out lengthy texts and seemingly seeking to use the statement as a Trojan horse by which to introduce evidence that the court has excluded. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags 13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements16. Criticism and Complaints Related articles Ms Julia Tosh v Mr Vivek Gupta [2025] EWHC 2025 (KB) How should Experts disclose criticisms when they are frequently unaware of the outcome of the case? Rebecca Hepworth v Dr Amanda Coates [2025] EWHC 1907 (KB) Failed extraction of a wisdom tooth Benjamin Hetherington (by his father and litigation friend Gary Hetherington) v Raymond Fell & Anor [2025] EWHC 1487 (KB) Switch article Kwik-Fit Properties Ltd v Resham Ltd [2024] EWCC 4 Previous Article The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.