05 September 2024 Keith Rix 739 Case Updates When is a summary not a summary? byKeith Rix Commentary The experts in this case appear to have set out a joint statement in the form of a Scott schedule. Unfortunately one of the experts used his column to set out lengthy texts and seemingly seeking to use the statement as a Trojan horse by which to introduce evidence that the court has excluded. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags 13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements16. Criticism and Complaints Related articles Podcast Episode 12: Expert Discussions and Joint Statements Martin Craig Nicholas & Ors v Barnes Davison Thomas & Anor [2025] EWHC 752 (Ch) Rajan Marwaha v Director of Border Revenue & Anor Revenue & Anor Legal teams need to observe Expert’s fatigue & concentration EWI publishes new Guidance on Expert Discussions and Joint Statements Switch article Kwik-Fit Properties Ltd v Resham Ltd [2024] EWCC 4 Previous Article The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.