05 September 2024 Keith Rix 964 Case Updates When is a summary not a summary? byKeith Rix Commentary The experts in this case appear to have set out a joint statement in the form of a Scott schedule. Unfortunately one of the experts used his column to set out lengthy texts and seemingly seeking to use the statement as a Trojan horse by which to introduce evidence that the court has excluded. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags 13. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements16. Criticism and Complaints Related articles Andrew Cannestra v Mclaren Automotive Events Limited [2025] EWHC 1844 (KB) A fundamentally flawed report Podcast Episode 14: Reflections on the EWI Annual Conference 2025 Most unsatisfactory expert paediatric evidence Email chains, gross misconduct and the experts who count the cost Switch article Kwik-Fit Properties Ltd v Resham Ltd [2024] EWCC 4 Previous Article The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.