05 September 2024 Keith Rix 424 Case Updates When is a summary not a summary? byKeith Rix Commentary The experts in this case appear to have set out a joint statement in the form of a Scott schedule. Unfortunately one of the experts used his column to set out lengthy texts and seemingly seeking to use the statement as a Trojan horse by which to introduce evidence that the court has excluded. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login More links Link to the Judgment Share Print Tags 12. Experts Discussions and Joint Statements15. Criticism and Complaints Related articles Kohler Mira Limited v Norcros Group (Holdings) Limited [2024] EWHC 3247 (Ch) Mantir Singh Sahota v Albinder Singh Sahota & Ors [2024] EWHC 2165 (Ch) Podcast Episode 8: Re-evaluating your opinion Podcast Episode 7: Review of 2024 When expert evidence falls well below the standard of a competent expert witness Switch article Kwik-Fit Properties Ltd v Resham Ltd [2024] EWCC 4 Previous Article The MCA’s belief requirement is wrong in law Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.