2 October Case Updates John Good against West Bay Insurance Plc [2025] SC AIR 70 Scotland, 16. Criticism and Complaints, 10. Records Assessments and Site Visits, McGill, Kennedy v Cordia, 11. Report Writing, 14. Changing your opinion, 15. Giving Oral Evidence The person insured by the defendant drove his motorcycle into the pursuer’s parked lorry causing the pursuer, who claimed he was standing on the steps of the lorry on one foot and leaning on the cab, to allegedly lose his balance and suffer injuries. The defendant led an expert witness, Mr H, who presented himself as a Forensic Engineer, and the pursuer an Orthopaedic expert, Mr S. The Sherrif concluded that he could not afford Mr H’s conclusions more than minimal weight because of a failure of methodology. Mr H had also expressed his conclusions in terms that gave the appearance that he was the decision-maker and made concessions during cross-examination. The Sherrif found Mr S to be a credible and reliable witness overall but noted that he was not clear when describing his fee arrangements.