06 October 2020 Priya Vaidya 1076 Case Updates Akhmedova v Akhmedov [2020] EWHC 2235 (Fam), 2020 WL 04742216 byPriya Vaidya Topic: Expert’s declaration Mr Brodie QC made much in cross-examination of Professor Dr Zollner's and Professor Dr Brandstetter's failure to include the expert's declaration pursuant to paragraph 9.1(i) of FPR Practice Direction 25B in their respective reports, he failed to persuade me that this was a matter of substance that had impacted upon their written and oral evidence. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Expert declaration06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing Related articles Is baldness a disease? Ivan Norman v N & CJ Horton Property (a firm) [2024] EWHC 2994 (Ch) Navigating the excessive difference in valuations from two Expert Quantity Surveyors Expert evidence in judicial review proceedings Postponement of the Extended Fixed Recoverable Costs Stocktake and Uprating of Fixed Cost Medical Reports Switch article Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd, Re [2020] EWHC 2299 (Ch) Previous Article Top ten tips for giving evidence remotely Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.