06 October 2020 Priya Vaidya 1652 Case Updates Akhmedova v Akhmedov [2020] EWHC 2235 (Fam), 2020 WL 04742216 byPriya Vaidya Topic: Expert’s declaration Mr Brodie QC made much in cross-examination of Professor Dr Zollner's and Professor Dr Brandstetter's failure to include the expert's declaration pursuant to paragraph 9.1(i) of FPR Practice Direction 25B in their respective reports, he failed to persuade me that this was a matter of substance that had impacted upon their written and oral evidence. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Expert declaration06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing Related articles Access to Public Domain Documents Pilot will launch on the 1st January 2026 An unsatisfactory forensic medical report Sir Michael Davies Lecture 2025: Lady Simler, Enhancing Expert Evidence: Reports, Opinions, and Judicial Perspectives. Impact speed and risk of injury Read between the lines, judge Switch article Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd, Re [2020] EWHC 2299 (Ch) Previous Article Top ten tips for giving evidence remotely Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.