06 October 2020 Priya Vaidya 1309 Case Updates Akhmedova v Akhmedov [2020] EWHC 2235 (Fam), 2020 WL 04742216 byPriya Vaidya Topic: Expert’s declaration Mr Brodie QC made much in cross-examination of Professor Dr Zollner's and Professor Dr Brandstetter's failure to include the expert's declaration pursuant to paragraph 9.1(i) of FPR Practice Direction 25B in their respective reports, he failed to persuade me that this was a matter of substance that had impacted upon their written and oral evidence. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Expert declaration06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing Related articles An expert report that is entirely equivocal on the key issues is of little assistance to the court The diagnosis hang-up and cardiological manifestations of PTSD Expert suggests Google would probably give the court a better answer than him A Day in the Life of a Plastic, Aesthetic and Hair transplant Surgeon and Expert Witness Disability and exclusion from school Switch article Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd, Re [2020] EWHC 2299 (Ch) Previous Article Top ten tips for giving evidence remotely Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.