06 October 2020 Priya Vaidya 1014 Case Updates Akhmedova v Akhmedov [2020] EWHC 2235 (Fam), 2020 WL 04742216 byPriya Vaidya Topic: Expert’s declaration Mr Brodie QC made much in cross-examination of Professor Dr Zollner's and Professor Dr Brandstetter's failure to include the expert's declaration pursuant to paragraph 9.1(i) of FPR Practice Direction 25B in their respective reports, he failed to persuade me that this was a matter of substance that had impacted upon their written and oral evidence. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Expert declaration05. Rules and Regulations10. Report Writing Related articles Kohler Mira Limited v Norcros Group (Holdings) Limited [2024] EWHC 3247 (Ch) Medical reporting agency at work Podcast Episode 9: Becoming an Expert Witness A mother's malign influence on her children JXX v Scott Archibald [2025] EWHC 69 (SCCO) Switch article Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd, Re [2020] EWHC 2299 (Ch) Previous Article Top ten tips for giving evidence remotely Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.