Check out our Case Updates and Member Magazine

Looking for more news relevant to the Expert Witness community? Why not check out our database of cases relevant to Expert Evidence or the latest and previous editions of our member magazine, Expert Matters.

News

Clicking on one of the topics below will display news items relevant to that topic. You can also use the search bar below to identify news items.

Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd, Re [2020] EWHC 2299 (Ch)
Priya Vaidya 810

Legal and General Assurance Society Ltd, Re [2020] EWHC 2299 (Ch)

byPriya Vaidya

Relevance:      General

Topic: Expert’s reasoning     

The Court was provided with the expert’s conclusions, but without being provided with the information to test whether any difference between the two companies was in LGAS’s or in ReAssure’s favour or how the conclusion that the difference was not material was justified. 

The court should therefore have sufficient information, not so as to review the independent expert’s “workings”, but so as to be able to assess that Mr Gillespie’s conclusions in this important respect are soundly based.

 

To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. 

Already a member? Login

 

Share

Print
Comments are only visible to subscribers.