27 September 2022 Priya Vaidya 3411 Case Updates DPP v MR [2022] IECA 192 by Priya Vaidya The case: the respondent was a person with a long history of mental health issues. He had pleaded guilty to a number of offences: arson, assault causing harm, theft, assault, using or engaging in threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour and being intoxicated in a public place. The Director of Public Prosecutions sought a review of the sentences on the grounds that some of these were unduly lenient. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags PsychiatrySentencing06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing Related articles The mandatory duty on range of opinion Scottish Medicolegal Conference 2026 Categorisation of injuries for sentencing purposes Psychologists and general practitioner records Blackpool Borough Council v RR [2026] EWFC 69 Switch article Dr Y, Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service Previous Article Bitar v Bank of Beirut SAL [2022] EWHC 2163 (QB) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.