27 September 2022 Priya Vaidya 1191 Case Updates DPP v MR [2022] IECA 192 byPriya Vaidya The case: the respondent was a person with a long history of mental health issues. He had pleaded guilty to a number of offences: arson, assault causing harm, theft, assault, using or engaging in threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour and being intoxicated in a public place. The Director of Public Prosecutions sought a review of the sentences on the grounds that some of these were unduly lenient. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags PsychiatrySentencing05. Rules and Regulations10. Report Writing Related articles Preliminary (pre-report) experts’ meetings Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Khan & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 531 Pfizer Inc v Uniqure Biopharma BV [2024] EWHC 2672 (Pat) How not to use AI in expert evidence Steven Wilson v Ministry of Justice [2024] EWHC 2389 (KB) Switch article Dr Y, Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service Previous Article Bitar v Bank of Beirut SAL [2022] EWHC 2163 (QB) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.