06 October 2020 Priya Vaidya 881 Case Updates GFH Capital Ltd v Haigh [2020] 7 WLUK 405 byPriya Vaidya The case: The applicant (H) applied to vary an order for disclosure made against him following the grant of summary judgment to the respondent. In support of the application he provided medical reports in respect of a road traffic accident that he said he had been involved in in March 2020, a psychiatrist's letter that he was not in a state to give evidence or engage in legal work, a letter from his GP stating that he was receiving treatment for mental health problems, a fitness for work statement that he was signed off work for three months suffering from PTSD and a therapist's letter that he was not fit to appear in court. He subsequently alleged that his health had further deteriorated since making the application, but did not adduce any further evidence. He did not attend the hearing. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Capacity to litigate10. Report Writing09. Records Assessments and Site Visits Related articles Is it within the remit of an expert to decide which witness of fact they believe or disbelieve? When the joint statement is no more than really two statements, one from each expert. The dangers of a considerable burden of expert work Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Khan & Ors [2024] EWCA Civ 531 Pfizer Inc v Uniqure Biopharma BV [2024] EWHC 2672 (Pat) Switch article GSTT, SLAM v R [2020] EWCOP 4, 2020 WL 00476197 Previous Article Griffiths v TUI UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 2268 (QB) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.