23 August 2021 Wiebke Morgan 2176 Case Updates Kwikbolt Limited v Airbus Operations Limited [2021] EWHC 732 (IPEC) byWiebke Morgan The case: A patent case Judgment as to the conduct of the expert witnesses: Mr Vanhegan's submissions on Mr X as a witness mirrored those of Mr Ward on Mr Y: he was a good witness in cross-examination doing his best to help the court, but his report was not satisfactory. Each legal team was, by implication, accusing the other of having an overbearing influence on its expert. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Expert's behaviour11. Report Writing08. Working with Instructing Parties Related articles Alame & Ors v Shell PLC & Anor [2025] EWHC 1539 (KB) The expert's flawed understanding of the intermediary's role The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care v PPE Medpro Limited [2025] EWHC 2486 (Comm) Why you must verify AI-generated content in your expert report Yodel Delivery Network Limited v Jacob Corlett & Ors [2025] EWHC 1435 (Ch) Switch article R v Lall [2021] EWCA Crim 404, 2021 WL 01041724 Previous Article Towuaghantse v General Medical Council [2021] EWHC 681 (Admin) Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.