14 December 2021 Priya Vaidya 1373 Case Updates WWRT Limited v Tyshchenko [2021] EWHC 939 (Ch) byPriya Vaidya The reports of two experts contained no CPR-compliant statements of truth, nor did they otherwise comply with the requirements of CPR Part 35. To continue reading you must be an EWI member, become a member and access exclusive content. Already a member? Login Share Print Tags Forensic accountancy06. Rules and Regulations11. Report Writing Related articles Read between the lines, judge John Good against West Bay Insurance Plc [2025] SC AIR 70 Aspirin and haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome Dating non-accidental injuries Is bite mark evidence admissible? Switch article TMO Renewables Ltd v Yeo & Ors [2021] EWHC 2033 (Ch) Previous Article PCP Capital Partners LLP v Barclays Bank PLC [2021] EWHC 307 (Comm), 2021 WL 00741982 Next Article Comments are only visible to subscribers.